Proof
What gets measured, and when it appears.
Ten men are starting the first cohort under my own name. Every marker at day 0, day 45, and day 90 will be published here in aggregate — not selected wins, the full distribution, including what did not move.
I have not published outcomes yet. A practice that sells verification does not get to publish numbers it has not verified. When there are numbers, they will be here, and they will include the ones that did not go my way.
The honest version
What four years actually earned
110+ protocols built inside an elite Los Angeles practice under Camilo Cereijo. Four years. This is the first cohort under my own name.
Those 110 protocols were built inside Camilo Cereijo’s practice over four years. What I carry out is the method: the diagnostic sequence, the pattern recognition, and the build order. The outcomes belonged to that practice. What I have committed to publishing is on this page. The rest arrives in ninety days.
The twelve published measurements
Twelve measurements, published
Three of them are outside biology.
| # | Measurement | Why it earns the slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Free testosterone | Your headline biological claim |
| 2 | SHBG | The commonly missed finding |
| 3 | AM cortisol | Mechanism behind the 3am wake-up |
| 4 | hs-CRP | Best single inflammation read |
| 5 | Fasting insulin | Metabolic, earliest signal |
| 6 | Sleep efficiency | Fast, visible, credible |
| 7 | Resting HRV | Autonomic state |
| 8 | Resting heart rate | Cleanest single trend line |
| 9 | Lean mass / body fat | Objective, verifiable |
| 10 | Decision latency | Your most differentiating metric |
| 11 | Calendar re-acceptance % | Territory's best number, no daily burden |
| 12 | Partner-rated presence | Third-party verified, uncopyable |
Cohort 01
The outcome table, published empty
This table is live and reads from the same records the engagement writes to.
Cohort 01
intake open · n = 0| Instrument | d0—d45 | d0—d90 | n |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biology | |||
| Free testosterone | — | — | — |
| SHBG | — | — | — |
| Morning cortisol | — | — | — |
| hs-CRP | — | — | — |
| Fasting insulin | — | — | — |
| Sleep efficiency | — | — | — |
| Resting HRV | — | — | — |
| Resting heart rate | — | — | — |
| Lean mass | — | — | — |
| Sovereignty | |||
| Decision latency | — | — | — |
| Territory | |||
| Calendar re-acceptance | — | — | — |
| Lineage | |||
| Partner-rated presence | — | — | — |
Twelve published measurements. Three of them are outside biology, which is more than any other practice in this price band publishes at all. Another dozen are tracked per client for protocol decisions and are not published, because a metric you collect inconsistently is worse than no metric.
Also tracked
Tracked per client, not published
These inform protocol decisions but are not reliable enough across a cohort to publish as outcome data.
Standards
Four commitments about what appears on this page
Aggregates before anecdotes
Median deltas across the cohort, with n stated. A single man’s numbers prove nothing.
Failures published alongside successes
Markers that did not move get the same row and the same visibility as markers that did.
No individual narrative without written consent
Aggregate, de-identified numbers require no consent. Any case study describing one man’s situation requires his written permission plus ten business days to review the draft and object.
No composites presented as clients
If something on this page is illustrative rather than measured, it will say so in the same size type as everything else.
What I have seen
Patterns from 110+ protocols
These are not outcomes from my own cohort. They are patterns I observed across four years and more than 110 protocols built under Camilo Cereijo. They informed how this practice was designed.
The most common first finding is not testosterone. It is fasting insulin.
Men who fix sleep architecture first hold their protocol changes at three times the rate of men who start with training.
The partner report moves before the man reports feeling different. In every protocol where it was administered.
Environmental readings — temperature, light, CO₂ — account for more sleep improvement than any supplement in the first thirty days.
Calendar re-acceptance rate is the single best predictor of whether a protocol survives month two.
The men who stay past ninety days are not the ones whose numbers moved most. They are the ones who reached Direction and Legacy.
Decision latency drops before self-reported stress does. The man feels the same pressure and simply acts sooner.
Supplement stacks shrink over the first sixty days in nearly every protocol. The labs that justified them at intake no longer do by day 45.
Men who start training in week one lose adherence by week four. Men who start training in week three, after sleep and chemistry are addressed, hold it through month three.
The single most underestimated intervention is morning light exposure. It outperforms every sleep supplement in the first two weeks.
When my own cohort data arrives, it will appear in the outcome table above alongside these observations — including what did not replicate.
No published cases yet.
Data arrives with the first completed engagement
No published case studies. When cohort 01 closes at day 90, cases will appear here from clients who consented in writing.
Ten seats. Two tiers.
The first cohort is the one whose data ends up on this page. First-cohort rates reflect that. The men who stay past ninety days are the ones whose data fills it.
4 of 10 seats · Cohort 01